Talk:Scientific integrity
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education assignment: BIOL4410 senior seminar
[edit]
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 7 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kitterbitter160, Jocelynmunozf, Tnr025 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Mrl058, Mketr, Viri0831, Victorialbowles1042.
— Assignment last updated by Kitterbitter160 (talk) 00:11, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Open access
[edit]Someone added "Clarification needed" in the section on open access and code. If my edits have sufficiently addressed the concern, can that tag be removed? Ed Gracely (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]There's a new article on Questionable research practices, but it's scope is so similar to that presented here that I think that it is best merged. Klbrain (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
- I understand this argument. I felt that Questionable research practices needed its own page because it refers to a specific set of behaviors. It has really taken off in scientific research. There are many studies looking at "Questionable research practices". These deviate some from integrity, because many of them are not consciously undertaken. They are a product of environment, idiosyncratic features of the researcher and might be more learned than intentional behaviors. Integrity, suggests ethics and that people would do things consciously. But my main argument is that it is a strong emerging sub-field of scientific research referring to a set of behaviors that appears across disciplines for over a decade. Nbreznau (talk) 06:15, 9 April 2025 (UTC)