Jump to content

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Siege of Constantinople (860)/1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
 
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Siege of Constantinople (860)/1|Siege of Constantinople (860)]]===
===[[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Siege of Constantinople (860)/1|Siege of Constantinople (860)]]===
{{atopr}}

: {{al|Siege of Constantinople (860)|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Siege_of_Constantinople_(860)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • GAN review not found
: {{al|Siege of Constantinople (860)|noname=yes}} • <span class="plainlinksneverexpand">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Siege_of_Constantinople_(860)/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page]</span> • GAN review not found
: <span>{{#ifeq:{{PAGENAME}}|Good article reassessment/Siege of Constantinople (860)/1|[[Category:GAR/84]]}} '''Result''': Delisted.</span> [[User:AirshipJungleman29|&#126;~ AirshipJungleman29]] ([[User talk:AirshipJungleman29|talk]]) 13:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)<br/>
: {{GAR/current}}<br/>
Several uncited paragraphs. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 21:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Several uncited paragraphs. [[User:Z1720|Z1720]] ([[User talk:Z1720|talk]]) 21:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)


Line 10: Line 10:
:And thus the article fails the verifiable criteria;
:And thus the article fails the verifiable criteria;
:"reliable sources are cited inline. '''All content that could reasonably be challenged''', except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);" [[User:LeChatiliers Pupper|LeChatiliers Pupper]] ([[User talk:LeChatiliers Pupper|talk]]) 19:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
:"reliable sources are cited inline. '''All content that could reasonably be challenged''', except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);" [[User:LeChatiliers Pupper|LeChatiliers Pupper]] ([[User talk:LeChatiliers Pupper|talk]]) 19:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
{{abot}}

Latest revision as of 13:27, 27 March 2025

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Several uncited paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 21:25, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree lacks its citation especially critically in the final section where significant claims are made in terms of historical sources interpretation.
A source is cited (Zuckerman 2000) I have done my best to try and find an online accessible version but all I am turning up is book reviews.
Perhaps Zuckerman provides information that would cite the whole paragraph but the editor who wrote that section cited only the first sentence - this is a mistake I have made myself so I would not be surprised. But I think someone would have to access the source to check and amend the citation.
And thus the article fails the verifiable criteria;
"reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);" LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 19:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.